Why is development in floodplains considered risky?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Get ready for your Architectural Planning Board Test. Enhance your knowledge with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ensure success on your exam!

Development in floodplains is considered risky primarily because it poses significant risks to safety and can result in higher insurance costs for property owners. When structures are built in areas that are prone to flooding, they become vulnerable to damage during flood events, which can endanger lives and property. These hazards not only impact the physical safety of the inhabitants but can also lead to substantial financial losses.

Moreover, due to the increased likelihood of flooding in these areas, insurance companies often raise premiums or may even deny coverage altogether for properties located in flood-prone zones. This financial burden can be a serious consideration for developers and homeowners alike, making floodplain development a risky endeavor.

Other options do not adequately reflect the inherent dangers and economic implications associated with floodplain developments. For instance, while some might assume that development could increase property values, this is overshadowed by the risks associated with flooding. Similar reasoning applies to the notions of excessive traffic congestion or lower construction costs, which do not address the immediate and pressing concerns of safety and financial impact related to flooding.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy